<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-2"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fractured Bloughtsblogs | Fractured Bloughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fracturedbloughts.rolandhesz.com/tag/blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fracturedbloughts.rolandhesz.com</link>
	<description>Musings about work and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 19:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19827</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who are the &#8216;bloggers&#8217;, and what do they eat?</title>
		<link>http://fracturedbloughts.rolandhesz.com/2008/02/09/who-are-the-bloggers-and-what-do-they-eat/</link>
		<comments>http://fracturedbloughts.rolandhesz.com/2008/02/09/who-are-the-bloggers-and-what-do-they-eat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 10:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roland Hesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heszroland.hu/2008/02/09/who-are-the-bloggers-and-what-do-they-eat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post actually was started last week, but time was rather sparse to finish it. I think that will emphasize some of the things I write here. So, I stumbled upon Shel Holtz post, I&#8217;m a blogger, just not one of these bloggers, then the next day, or in the evening I had a short...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post actually was started last week, but time was rather sparse to finish it. I think that will emphasize some of the things I write here.</p>
<p>So, I stumbled upon Shel Holtz post, <a href="http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/im_a_blogger_just_not_one_of_these_bloggers/" title="a shel of my former self" target="_blank">I&#8217;m a blogger, just not one of these bloggers</a>, then the next day, or in the evening I had a short conversation with <a href="http://twitter.com/CurtMonash/statuses/663871962" title="Curt Monash" target="_blank">Curt Monash</a>, and then I wanted to write a bit more of my thoughts on this whole &#8216;bloggers&#8217;thing.</p>
<p>First of all, who are the bloggers? Who <strong>is</strong> a &#8216;blogger&#8217;?</p>
<p>I find that people call everyone who has a blog a &#8216;blogger&#8217;, which seems like the correct thing, only. Only the word starts to get a more solid meaning. &#8216;Bloggers&#8217;do this, &#8216;bloggers&#8217;do that. It starts to become a primary attribute, something that defines the person.</p>
<p><span id="more-83"></span>I remember that a few years ago we had blogger meetings. The &#8216;bloggers&#8217;met in a pub. Well, actually it was a bunch of people from different professions and cities, who happened to write blogs, about their own life.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think we were bloggers. Not any more than we were diarists. It was a small part of our life, but then I could define myself as a lawnmower, or a driver or a walker &#8211; the latter I do more than any of the other &#8211; or maybe even a sitter, as I sit a lot.</p>
<p>I would keep the &#8216;blogger&#8217;tag to people who either make it their job, or for whom it is a big part of their job.<br />
I am not one. It&#8217;s a hobby,  it&#8217;s a way to put out my opinion if I wish, but I am not a &#8216;blogger&#8217;.  I can go for weeks without posting. I do not concentrate on anything in particular.  And I doubt that people who kept diaries or journals in the old times were called &#8216;diarists&#8217;, or &#8216;journalists&#8217;if I think about it. The latter means an entirely different thing.</p>
<p>So, I think most of the people we refer to as &#8216;bloggers&#8217;are just people. They eat the same stuff the rest of the world.</p>
<p>And then, there are some who write blogs as a job, or as a big part of their business, like <a href="http://gapingvoid.com/" title="gapingvoid" target="_blank">Hugh MacLeod</a>, or <a href="http://www.problogger.net/" title="ProBlogger" target="_blank">ProBlogger</a>, or <a href="http://blog.holtz.com/" title="a shel of my former self" target="_blank">Shel Holtz</a> who I would call bloggers, maybe.</p>
<p>Even then, I am hesitant to call a PR or marketing professional a blogger, even if half his work is done on a blog. He is not a blogger in my opinion, he just uses a tool.</p>
<p>So, the more I think about it, there are not many real bloggers.  Blogs are tools. A way to put your thoughts out there. Tools like emails, newsgroups, and you never heard anyone call people &#8216;emailers&#8217;or &#8216;newsgroupers&#8217;did you?</p>
<p>Just a few thoughts of a software developer, who sometimes posts on his blog.</p>
<p>And what are your thought?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fracturedbloughts.rolandhesz.com/2008/02/09/who-are-the-bloggers-and-what-do-they-eat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Global Microbrand</title>
		<link>http://fracturedbloughts.rolandhesz.com/2007/11/18/the-global-microbrand/</link>
		<comments>http://fracturedbloughts.rolandhesz.com/2007/11/18/the-global-microbrand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roland Hesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[echo chamber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[francis fukuyama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heszroland.hu/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other post is on gapingvoid, another favorite &#8211; ok, I admint mainly because Hugh MacLeod is into wine &#8211; and I won&#8217;t be able to tell you exactly why I like the post, what was so relevant about it. It is just plainly telling why I don&#8217;t blog so frequently. Time is scarce, and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other post is on <a href="http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/004339.html" target="_blank" title="Gapingvoid">gapingvoid</a>, another favorite &#8211; ok, I admint mainly because Hugh MacLeod is <a href="http://www.stormhoek.com/blog/" target="_blank" title="Stormhoek : Change the world, or go home">into wine</a> &#8211; and I won&#8217;t be able to tell you exactly why I like the post, what was so relevant about it.</p>
<p>It is just plainly telling why I don&#8217;t blog so frequently. Time is scarce, and yes, I am lazy at times, plus, when I got a good post idea I am either driving to/from work, out somewhere where I can&#8217;t write it down, or working so I simply don&#8217;t have time to do it.</p>
<p>And by the time I got home, I am either too tired, or too involved with my friends on secondlife to post here.</p>
<blockquote><p>The good news about blogs is that they&#8217;re very powerful. The bad news is that they&#8217;re very time consuming. So no wonder in the last two years we&#8217;ve seen so many other kinds of &#8220;Cheap, Easy, Global Media&#8221; spring up- Twitter, Facebook, YouTube etc etc.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-26"></span>I don&#8217;t really know about powerful. Probably they are, although I still see the &#8220;<a href="http://jeremy.zawodny.com/blog/archives/008053.html" target="_blank" title="Jeremy Zawodni">echo</a> <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2004/09/the_echo_chambe.html" target="_blank" title="Seth's blog">chamber</a>&#8221; effect mostly, bloggers oh-ing and ah-ing, techno sites raving and hype-ing, and then they realize that the rest of the world, the actual target does not give a damn about the subject. <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/23/iphone_will_fail/" target="_blank" title="The Register">iPhone introduced in the UK</a>, anyone?<br />
The time consuming yes, that I can attest too. If you write something else than your dinner, you need time. Not just to write the post. If I want to write a little review, or just an opinion about <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html%3FASIN=0684825252%26tag=ahelyremedene-20%26lcode=xm2%26cID=2025%26ccmID=165953%26location=/o/ASIN/0684825252%253FSubscriptionId=1N9AHEAQ2F6SVD97BE02" target="_blank">Francis Fukuyama&#8217;s book, The Trust</a>, I have to read it first. And not just read it, I have to mark up or note down interesting points and ideas in the book, and then I can start to write the post.</p>
<p>Twitter seems ok, but I need some for that too &#8211; unless all I want to &#8216;twit&#8217;about is my lunch, that my chair is uncomfortable, and such mundane, not too interesting things.</p>
<p>I think the main thing I liked in his post was</p>
<blockquote><p>Whoever said &#8220;Blogs are just a fad&#8221; back in the early days was missing the point. It was NEVER about blogs. It was about something far more &#8220;vast&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>This whole thing is not about blogs, or twitter, or such. It&#8217;s about being an exhibitionist, to have the desire to share our opinion &#8211; as someone in the hungarian &#8220;blogosphere&#8221;, one of the &#8220;bloggurus&#8221; of hungary put it: &#8220;to push their boring, uninteresting opinions and lives on the happless readers.&#8221;</p>
<p>He missed the point completely.  It&#8217;s not pushing. It&#8217;s displaying.  And then <strong>if</strong> you are interested, you<strong> can</strong> read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fracturedbloughts.rolandhesz.com/2007/11/18/the-global-microbrand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

